A COURSE IN MIRACLES
Copyright challenge

 



 
   Copyright tyranny and abuse is fast becoming the number one civil and human rights issue of the new century. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act threatens traditional expectations of freedom in research, education, publishing, music, art, religion and countless other aspects of our information society. Critics and civil libertarians believe it is the first step in limiting and criminalizing the "fair use" of information.

"Copyright reflects far more than economic interests. Embedded within conflicts over royalties and infringement are cultural values - about access, ownership, free speech, race, class, and democracy - which influence how rights are determined and enforced. Questions of legitimacy - of what constitutes "intellectual property" or "fair use," and of how to locate a precise moment of cultural creation - have become enormously complicated in recent years, as advances in technology have exponentially increased the speed of cultural reproduction and dissemination." Publisher of Copyrights and Copywrongs, Siva Vaidhyanathan

"There’s a war going on over the state of copyright law in this country, but it’s a war whose battles are largely being fought covertly. On the occasions when the conflicts are made public, they have not been recognized for what they signify. What has gone mostly unseen and unremarked upon is the effort by industries who benefit from copyright law to shift the balance of the law forever in their favor, and away from the public interest that, according to Article I of the U.S. Constitution, is supposed to be the beneficiary of copyrights. (The Constitution expressly says that copyright and patent laws are designed "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.)" Mike Godwin

"The Digital Millenium Copyright Act, passed by the U.S. Congress in 1998, updates copyright law for electronic commerce and electronic content providers. Unfortunately, this law is very poorly written, and is now regularly used by corporations to restrain the three primary concessions of copyright and otherwise prevent free speech activity." From anti-dmca.org

   In 1999, Dr. Kenneth Wapnick, head of FACIM began using the awesome power of The DMCA to restrict the "fair use" of A Course in Miracles. In a draconian assault on free speech and First amendment religious rights, numerous Miracles Web sites and newsgroups were shut down. The Foundation's attorneys threatened many Course students with lawsuits and sued others.  Robert Perry's scholarly book was denied publication because it exceeded The Foundation's arbitrary "Fair Use" Guidelines. At the time, many Course students were surprised at this unprovoked  assault on liberty. Even more startling, under DMCA all of this was apparently "legal."  Few realized that a cultural war-- indeed, a spiritual war -- had begun, pitting the the rights to royalties and control of ideas against democratic cultural values of access, ownership, free speech, and class. In the case of A Course in Miracles, spiritual and religious values weighed into the mix. In short order, the Miracles Community was denied fair access and fair use of its own spiritual writings.

   These draconian actions are obviously unconstitutional if undertaken by government, but under DMCA these actions are legal if committed by corporations. Herein lies the controversy and the struggle to maintain civil rights.  Moreover, if in the future fair use of information is criminalized, we will live in a de facto dictatorship.

  Those involved in the "fair use" struggle with Ken Wapnick and FACIM, already know this.

   Below is a list of links to sites discussing the DMCA, Fair Use and continued access to copyrighted materials. Learn what can be, and is being done to shape the future of Fair Use. When one learns the facts, The Course in Miracles Copyright Challenge is not an isolated controversy. Rather it is part of a world-wide struggle maintaining civil and human rights against corporate proprietary interests.

=============

 

 

SOURCE MATERIALS & ARTICLES
=============

 

 “Digital Copyright by Jessica Litman ~ Book Reviews”.


Now that technology permits the dissemination of information on a pay-per-view basis, we've seen the emergence of new way of thinking about copyright: Copyright is now seen as a tool for copyright owners to use to extract all the potential commercial value from works of authorship, even if that means that uses that have long been deemed legal are now brought within the copyright owner's control. In 1998, copyright owners persuaded Congress to enhance their rights with a sheaf of new legal and technological controls. Armed with those copyright improvements, copyright lawyers began a concerted campaign to remodel cyberspace into a digital multiplex and shopping mall for copyright-protected material. The outcome of that effort is still uncertain. If current trends continue unabated, however, we are likely to experience a violent collision between our expectations of freedom of expression and the enhanced copyright law.

http://www.msen.com/~litman/digital-copyright/
REVIEWS:
 
Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and how It Threatens Creativity
Siva Vaidhyanathan
"Copyright reflects far more than economic interests. Embedded within conflicts over royalties and infringement are cultural values - about access, ownership, free speech, race, class, and democracy - which influence how rights are determined and enforced. Questions of legitimacy - of what constitutes "intellectual property" or "fair use," and of how to locate a precise moment of cultural creation - have become enormously complicated in recent years, as advances in technology have exponentially increased the speed of cultural reproduction and dissemination." In Copyrights and Copywrongs, Siva Vaidhyanathan tracks the history of American copyright law through the twentieth century, from Mark Twain's vehement exhortations for "thick" copyright protection to recent lawsuits regarding sampling in rap music and the "digital moment," exemplified by the rise of Napster and MP3 technology. He argues that in its current punitive, highly restrictive form, American copyright law hinders cultural production, thereby contributing to the poverty of civic culture.
 
Other Books:
The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, Lawrence Lessig
A Nation under Lawyers, Mary Ann Ann Glendon
Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, Keith E. Maskus,Preface by C. Fred Bergsten
Playing Darts with a Rembrandt, Joseph L. L. Sax
 
Research Materials
  • Statutes
  • Judicial Opinions
  • Regulations
  • Treaties and Conventions

 

Locating Copyright in The First Amendment Skein

by Neil W. Netanel

 

Freedom Forum

The First Amendment Center works to preserve and protect First Amendment freedoms through information and education. The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of free-expression issues, including freedom of speech, of the press and of religion, the right to assemble and petition the government.

 

 

 

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
=============

 
The DMCA is a war on Education

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

"The DMCA is being used to silence researchers, computer scientists and critics.  Corporations are using it against the public. People are in Jail." 

http://anti-dmca.org/

Essays
Brad Templeton
An eBook Publisher on why Mueller should free Dmitry Sklyarov
PDF | HTML

Lawrence Lessig (NY Times)
Jail Time in the Digital Age

Salon
DMCA used to stop competition

Siva Vaidhyanathan
Copyrights and copywrongs: Why Thomas Jefferson Would Love Napster

Putting a lock on e-Books: A New Cold War Looms Over Your Right to Read

John Gilmore
What's Wrong with Copy Protection

Richard Stallman
Reevaluating Copyright
The Right To Read

US Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA)
Reaffirmation of Fair Use Rights

Negativland
Intellectual Property Issues

Tim Neu
First Amendment: Void Where Prohibited

Richard Forno
National Security and Individual Freedoms: How the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) Threatens Both

Harvard's Berkman Center
Rundown of DMCA cases

EFF
Felten v. RIAA - professor's academic presentation blocked by the DMCA

 

 
 

Political Prisoners
=============

 


Free Dmitry

http://freesklyarov.org/

7/18 Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
[Blue Ribbon Campaign icon]Once again, the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) is proving itself to be as harmful to civil liberties as we predicted it would be... this case is not about copyright infringement. Mr. Sklyarov is not accused of infringing anyone's copyrights. He is accused of building... a tool that allows the legitimate purchaser of an e-book to translate it from one digital format into another (from Adobe's eBook format into Adobe's Portable Document Format). Mr. Sklyarov is not being prosecuted for using the tool himself -- in fact, such a prosecution would be impossible, since using such a tool (as distinguished from building or distributing one) breaks no law. Mr. Sklyarov has entered the strange Twilight Zone of the DMCA, where using a tool is legal, but building it is a crime.
http://freesklyarov.org/

 

LEGAL AID, THINK TANKS, RESEARCH
=============

 

Imagine a world where technology can empower us all to share knowledge, ideas, thoughts, humor, music, words and art with friends, strangers and future generations.

That world is here and now, made possible with the electronic network -- the Internet -- with the power to connect us all. And future developments in technology will enable us to access information and communicate with others in even more powerful ways.

But governments and corporate interests worldwide are trying to prevent us from communicating freely through new technologies, just as when those in positions of power controlled the production and distribution of -- or even burned -- books they did not want people to read in the Middle Ages. But only by fighting for our rights to speak freely whatever the medium -- whether books, telephones, or computers -- can we protect and enhance the human condition.

Pitt Bulls for liberty!  EFF opposes misguided legislation, initiates and defends court cases preserving individuals' rights, launches global public campaigns, introduces leading edge proposals and papers, hosts frequent educational events, engages the press regularly, and publishes a comprehensive archive of digital civil liberties information at one of the most linked-to websites in the world: http://www.eff.org
 
The Freedom-to-Write Committee of PEN American Center protects the freedom of the written word wherever it is imperiled. It defends writers and journalists from all over the world who are imprisoned, threatened, or attacked in the course of carrying out their profession. In the U.S. it protests book-bannings in schools and counters legal challenges to the First Amendment.
 

The "Washington-based Becket Fund [is] a law practice devoted to the defense of religious liberty the way the ACLU is devoted to the defense of the Bill of Rights." William Raspberry, Washington Post, September 5, 1994

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty is a bipartisan and ecumenical, public-interest law firm that protects the free expression of all religious traditions.
  • Freedom of religion is a basic human right that no government may lawfully deny.
  • Religious expression — from all traditions — is a natural part of life in civilized society, and religious arguments, on all sides of a question, are a normal and healthy element in public debate.
  • Religious people and institutions are entitled to participate in government affairs on an equal basis with everyone else, and should not be excluded for professing their faith.
 
EPIC is a public interest research center in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging civil liberties issues and to protect privacy, the First Amendment, and constitutional values.
 

Copyright Abuse in Religion and Spirituality
=============

 

The Official
Urantia Foundation
Truth Site

Everything you ever wanted to know about Urantia Foundation, but were afraid to ask.

A religious site dedicated to religious freedom, "unceasing exposure" (53.5.6, Urantia Papers) of Urantia Foundation's sophistries, and resistance to Urantia Foundation's religious tyranny and persecution against believers of the Urantia Revelation.

(Strangely DEJA VU For ACIM readers.  Read about their copyright battle)

 
Scientology appears to use copyright, trademarks and "trade secret" laws to control dissenters, critics and apostates.

Click here to enter the twilight world of religious paranoia merged with Gestapo police state retribution.

3.24.02

    Scientologists Force Google To Cut Links

Google was accused Wednesday of effectively removing from the Internet a Web site that is critical of the Church of Scientology after it deleted links to some of the site's pages from its search engine.

The popular search company said it removed the links after it received a copyright-infringement complaint from the Church of Scientology. Andreas Heldal-Lund, Webmaster of the site Xenu.net, said in a Usenet posting that the complaint demanded that Google take down a large number of references to different parts of Xenu.net. Read More>>

 

 

The Helena Kobrin Love Page

Hilarious site devoted to Scientology lawyer, Helena Kobrin.  In the service of Scientology, she has sent repeated e-mails threatening dozens of netizens with legal action (here's just one example), attempted to eradicate alt.religion.scientology and even threatened legal action against the whole newsgroup!

Any one threatened with lawsuit by FACIM, will enjoy the witty, spirited and sometimes obscene responses to her legal threats.

http://www.demon.co.uk/castle/helena/

=============

Home | Overview | FAQ | Litigation | Articles | Timeline | Act | Polls | Links | Message | Guest Book | Civil Rights

Disclaimer: The information provided on jcim.net is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to selected legal issues. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional terms and conditions.  Copyright 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002  Monen & Whitmore, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. All rights reserved. 

Email: tom@whitmorelaw.com or content: acim-copyright@cox.net

 

Home | Overview | FAQ | Litigation | Articles | Timeline | Act | Polls | Links | Message | Guest Book | Civil Rights

Disclaimer: The information provided on jcim.net is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to selected legal issues. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional terms and conditions. Copyright 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002  Monen & Whitmore, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. All rights reserved. 

Email: tom@whitmorelaw.com or content: acim-copyright@cox.net